bridges over water hazards. | Golf Monthly

This is exactly correct (thanks) and my problem with the local rule. Is it legitimate, given how the hazard is marked. Apologies for not imputing into my own thread earlier - been away. If it were picture A then it is clearly marked - no argument and the same with picture B as it defines what part of the bridge is in the hazard. My club is confusing people, or at least me.

Exactly like picture B, but with no line highlighted across the bridge, therefore leaving me only to conclude that the stakes define the outer margin. That leaves part of the bridge out of the hazard, yet the local rule is stating all of the bridge is to be hazard.

I guess simply can they legitimately do this without changing the markers or painting a line around the bridge?